Written by 
Last night, the hard charging Marion City Council, and leadership took a significant step towards a potential restructuring of its government, unanimously voting to place the question of changing Marion from a statutory to a charter city on the November 4th ballot. The decision came after a spirited discussion and a procedural vote to suspend the three-reading rule, which passed 8-1.
This move could fundamentally alter how Marion is governed, shifting from a framework largely dictated by state law to one designed by its own residents.
The Charter City Initiative: A Path to Local Control
The approved ordinance, designated 2025-60, aims to establish a commission to frame a city charter and outlines the requirements for the election of its members. Law Director Mark Russell referred to it as the “clean ordinance,” emphasizing that it solidifies key dates, removes the option for a slate of candidates, lowers the minimum number of signatures required for commission petitions to five, and introduces a council contingency for appointments if all fifteen commission spots aren’t filled by election.
Council members underscored the urgency of the vote due to strict timelines. If the ordinance passes, a tight window of approximately 14 days will be available for commission members to prepare and submit their petitions to the Board of Elections. The August 11th deadline for petition submission means swift action is required from interested residents.
Councilman Mr. Neff highlighted the urgency, stating, “The action by council tonight is simply do we want to give the voters the option to pursue our charter or not? That’s the question before council tonight.”
A concerned resident at the meeting questioned the rapid approval, noting, “I was wondering why solar panels on garages were worth three readings, but a fundamental change to our government might not be.” The resident also raised concerns about potential financial ramifications, estimating costs could reach $60,000-$70,000, and questioned the council’s ability to appoint members to the commission, advocating for all 15 members to be chosen by the people.
Conversely, others spoke in favor of the initiative. Ms. Fisher argued, “I am they, I am in favor of this and so I’m saying that putting the charter should go before the citizens because they’re the ones that should decide.” She emphasized the voters’ constitutional right to make this decision.
Cody Higley, though not a Marion city resident, was granted permission to speak by an 8-1 council vote, arguing that county residents have a vested interest in Marion as a regional hub. He presented research showing that out of 17 Ohio cities comparable in population to Marion, only two (Marion and Warren) remain statutory cities, with the rest having adopted charters. He encouraged future commission members to research successful charter models.
Here’s a summary of the key information presented:
- Marion (Marion Co):
- Population (2020): 35,999
- Median Household Income (2020): $45,829
- Type: Statutory
- Form: N/A
- Comparison Cities (All Charter except Warren): The table lists 16 other cities. Out of these, 15 are Charter cities, and only Warren (Trumbull Co), like Marion, is a Statutory city.
- Population Range: All cities listed, including Marion, fall within a population range of 30,808 to 40,552, consistent with the note stating “Data reflects all 17 cities in the state of Ohio (out of a total of 253) with a total resident population of between 30,999 to 40,999.”
- Median Household Income Variation: There’s a significant range in median household incomes among these comparable cities, from $36,955 (Warren) to $150,993 (Upper Arlington). Marion’s median household income of $45,829 is on the lower end of this spectrum.
- Forms of Government for Charter Cities:
- Mayor-Council: Lima, Westlake, North Olmsted, Fairborn, Findlay, North Ridgeville, Brunswick, Stow, Bowling Green.
- Council-Manager: Lancaster, Gahanna, Westerville, Hilliard, Upper Arlington, Mason.
- Mayor-Council-Administrator: Bowling Green (also listed as Mayor-Council, suggesting a dual classification or specific nuance).
The sources cited for this data are the Ohio Secretary of State and Census Reporter. The primary purpose of this table appears to be to show how Marion compares to other Ohio cities of similar size, particularly in its governmental structure (Statutory vs. Charter).
Speaker Theresa directly asked Mayor Collins for his intentions regarding signing the legislation. Mayor Collins confirmed his intent to sign the ordinance promptly, stating, “I have no intention of not signing it and I will pass it on and let the voters of Marion decide.”
Council members also debated the potential for a charter to address long-standing issues, particularly financial ones. Councilwoman Miss Laing noted that a charter could “open up the ability to bring in people from outside of Marion that would be able to do the financial… be a financial director,” potentially bringing fresh perspectives. The prevailing sentiment was that the charter presents a crucial opportunity for citizens to shape their city’s future.
If the measure passes in November, a charter commission made up of the 15 certified applicants with the most votes will convene to draft a new version of the city government. This proposed framework would then be put to another vote by Marion city residents.
Our appearance at council last week to request a Forensic IT Audit was based on expertise from law enforcement and information technology within our team. The team unanimously voted to move forward with the investigation and request after several years of research.
Our investigation into Marion, Ohio’s financial health, as highlighted in our Silent Sabotage series and other works, uncovers a deeper and more troubling timeline than commonly understood. This administration has inherited a mess and is diligently working to fix the issue. While financial discrepancies are frequently cited from 2020 onward in public forums and news, evidence suggests the city has faced severe financial challenges since at least 2006-2008, and had overall favorable financial bill of health until that time. Critically, we have learned from current and former officials that essential financial tools, specifically a “reconciliation module” and its accompanying software, were neither properly installed nor fully utilized. This oversight has left the city’s digital assets exposed, creating a significant risk for hidden funds and various illicit financial activities. Here’s a summary of the problems arising from the module’s non-use.
For more than ten years, the City of Marion has been operating with a critical blind spot in its financial oversight. Our investigation has uncovered that a key component of the city’s modern financial system – a reconciliation module – was installed when the system was deployed around 2006 but never properly configured or made functional. This isn’t just a technical glitch; it’s a fundamental breakdown that has created an environment ripe for financial irregularities, including fraud and abuse. Sources state this module has never worked under previous administrations, we are unsure if it is currently functioning due to lack of communication from the Marion City Auditor.
A properly functioning reconciliation module acts as an essential safeguard. It’s designed to automatically compare the city’s internal financial records with external statements, such as bank accounts. Think of it as a vigilant watchman, cross-referencing every dollar in and every dollar out, flagging any inconsistencies or suspicious activity immediately. When this watchman is absent or incapacitated, the door is left wide open.
Without this crucial tool, the city was forced to rely on manual, secondary methods to verify its financial position, such as a trial budget ledger. This labor-intensive and error-prone approach makes it incredibly difficult to spot discrepancies, whether they stem from simple mistakes or deliberate manipulation. It creates an atmosphere where funds can seemingly vanish, unrecorded transactions can occur, and unauthorized payments can slip through the cracks without immediate detection.
While the full extent of the impact is still being assessed, initial findings from previous balance ledgers indicate significant negative balances in key cash accounts, at times reaching millions of dollars. These concerning figures suggest that for an extended period, the city’s true financial standing may have been obscured, potentially allowing for the misdirection or misappropriation of public funds. The fact that this critical module remained non-functional for over a decade, across a change in city administrations, multiple times, raises serious questions about accountability and financial diligence. In the Information Technology sector, this type of blatant disregard for safeguarded systems is considered unacceptable.
The implications for taxpayer dollars and the city’s financial health are profound. In our upcoming articles, we will delve deeper into the specific areas most vulnerable to such systemic failures and explore the concrete steps needed to restore integrity and transparency to the City of Marion’s finances.
These types of activities, along with the documented thefts and abuses in the past, should prompt a very in depth Forensic IT Audit. The IT industry universally considers a rigorous, root-cause investigation to be a non-negotiable standard when severe system breaches involving unauthorized access, backdoors, or compromised access rights are reported. It’s not merely a suggestion; it’s a fundamental principle of effective cybersecurity and incident management.
Additional Council Actions and Community Dialogue
Beyond the charter discussion, the City Council addressed several other key ordinances and heard public comments on diverse community issues:
- Paving Project Funds (Ordinance 2025-76): Council unanimously approved an additional appropriation within the SCMR fund to complete paving on streets, partnering with a township paving project. The three-reading rule was suspended for this, passing 9-0.
- Demolition Adjustments (Ordinance 2025-77): An adjustment to appropriations for demolitions in the general fund was unanimously adopted after receiving funds from the county land bank for asbestos-containing houses. The three-reading rule was suspended 9-0.
- Workforce Mobility Grant (Ordinance 2025-78): Adjustments to appropriations for a workforce mobility grant were unanimously approved to reimburse $40,000 for supplies and equipment (including $32,000 for new radios and $8,000 for software updates) and $25,000 as the city’s match for a previously purchased bus. The motion to suspend readings carried 9-0.
- Insurance Payment Adjustments (Ordinance 2025-79): Council unanimously approved adjustments for an insurance payment received for a totaled police cruiser, with the city’s portion being covered by existing budget funds. The three-reading rule was suspended 9-0.
- New Workforce Mobility Grant Application (Ordinance 2025-80): Council authorized the transit administrator to apply for an SFY 2026 workforce mobility partnership program grant. The ordinance, which had been updated with specific dollar amounts not initially provided to council, will cover marketing-related projects with a city match of approximately $15,000 for a $150,000 federal grant. This application has an August 8th deadline. The three-reading rule was suspended 9-0.
- Assistant Water Pollution Control Superintendent Pay (Ordinance 2025-81): To correct a typographical error in a previous ordinance, council unanimously approved amending the job description of the assistant superintendent to reflect the intended pay grade of 31E, which the administration stated was promised to the individual. The three-reading rule was suspended 9-0.
- Central Ohio Regional Planning Organization (CORPO) Grant (Ordinance 2025-82): Council unanimously approved establishing a CORPO dedicated funds program application, authorizing the service director to apply and administer the grant for a $150,000 project. The project aims to convert the Barks Road U-turn into a safer “Michigan U-turn” design, with a 20% city match ($30,000) potentially covered by TIF funds. This application also has an August 8th deadline. Concerns about the safety and original installation of the bollards on Barks Road were raised by Councilman Mr. Ratliff and addressed by Law Director Russell and Service Director Michael Bodine II, who explained the state’s liability concerns if the city removed them. The motion to suspend committee consideration passed 9-0, and the motion to amend the ordinance to reflect the updated details also passed unanimously. The three-reading rule was suspended 9-0.
Public Concerns and Administration Responses
Several residents brought forward concerns during the public comment section:
- Trees on Church Street: Residents again expressed alarm over dead and leaning trees on her street, which she believes were damaged by Aqua (the water company) during sidewalk repairs. She highlighted safety risks, citing recent fatalities in Ohio due to falling trees, and urged the city to act. Service Director Bodine confirmed that Aqua is monitoring the trees and he would follow up with them, stating it’s Aqua’s responsibility.
- Pool Filling and Utility Bills: A constituent of Councilman Mr. Prader raised concerns about high utility bills after filling a pool, particularly regarding storm sewer charges when the water is not immediately entering the sewer system. While Service Director Bodine explained that storm sewer charges are typically a flat fee ($7 a month) and based on water usage, resident Naomi Craig shared that her mother-in-law calls Aqua when filling a pool to have that usage subtracted from the bill, which then adjusts the utility billing. Kent corroborated this, noting that in the City of Kent, they would deduct pool water from sanitary bills upon notification.
- Livestock in City Limits: Councilman Mr. T. Smith inquired about the legality of chickens and roosters within city limits. Law Director Russell explained that Marion’s revised animal ordinance allows for permits for chickens through the Safety Director and Zoning Inspector, but roosters are prohibited. He also clarified that the intent was primarily for 4-H projects. Former Zoning Compliance Inspector Malcolm Smith provided insights into the permit process and compliance issues, noting that specific limits on the number of animals and proximity to property lines are in the ordinance, and that past issues with residents having too many ducks or unconfined animals were addressed. Councilwoman Laing highlighted a current issue with 12 ducks in her ward, indicating a need for the ordinance to be re-evaluated and potentially rewritten.
- Dollar General Development Rumors: Resident Naomi Craig raised concerns about a rumored Dollar General at Silver Street and 309. She stated that a recent neighborhood meeting, organized by the Martin Luther King Neighborhood Association at Logos Church, spread misinformation, including the idea that the Dollar General was a “done deal” and that nearby land had already been annexed. She voiced worries about increased traffic, rainwater runoff impacting old sewer lines, loitering, and alcohol sales near an elementary school. Mayor Collins clarified that the meeting was hosted by the Martin Luther King Association (not Logos Church directly), and that discussions about the Dollar General centered on the possibility of annexation if they wanted to connect to city sewer lines, not that it was a finalized project. He emphasized that the West End is considered a “food desert” and a Dollar General could be beneficial, but “the ink’s not dry.” Ms. Dyer, representing the Martin Luther King Neighborhood Association, defended the association’s efforts to engage residents and expressed frustration at “secret meeting” rumors, emphasizing the association’s positive work in the West End.
Upcoming Meetings and Continued Efforts
Council members confirmed upcoming committee meetings, including Jobs and Economic Development at 6:30 PM and Finance Committee at 6:35 PM on an unspecified date. Councilman Mr. T. Smith also announced progress on revising the city’s codified ordinances regarding e-bikes, motorized mopeds, four-wheelers, and other “electric toys” that have become nuisances, promising a proposal within the next month. Mayor Collins shared a success story from the recent “Love Your Neighborhood” event, where volunteers discovered a neglected home that might be saved through the land bank, highlighting the program’s value in identifying such situations.
The City of Marion continues to work towards addressing its challenges and engaging residents in shaping its future, with the potential charter city vote poised to be a pivotal decision for the community.