Federal Blitz in Colorado Springs: DEA-Led Raid Nets 114 Immigrants, Military Personnel at Alleged Drug & Gang Hub
Anatomy of a Raid: Federal Operation Shuts Down Colorado Springs “Underground Nightclub,” Detains Over 100 Immigrants
Introduction: Anatomy of a Raid
In the pre-dawn hours of Sunday, April 27, 2025, a massive federal law enforcement operation descended upon an alleged “underground nightclub” in Colorado Springs. Initial reports painted a dramatic picture: hundreds of officers, the seizure of drugs and weapons, and, most notably, the arrest and detention of over 100 individuals identified as undocumented immigrants.1 Led by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the raid involved an unusually large contingent of federal agencies alongside local police, targeting what authorities described as a hub for drug trafficking, prostitution, and violent crime, allegedly frequented by members of transnational gangs like Tren de Aragua (TdA) and MS-13.4
This article provides an in-depth investigation into the operation, moving beyond the initial headlines to verify the facts, analyze the complex interplay of objectives, and examine the legal and community context. The raid occurred against a backdrop of intensified federal immigration enforcement under the second Trump administration 1, adding layers of complexity to an operation ostensibly focused on narcotics and organized crime. The sheer scale of the multi-agency response, involving over ten federal entities 3, the detention of active-duty U.S. military personnel found inside 1, and the significant number of immigration arrests 3 warrant a closer examination of the raid’s justification, execution, and consequences.
The Operation: Verified Facts and Timeline
The multi-agency enforcement action commenced in the early hours of Sunday, April 27, 2025. Arrests and detentions reportedly began around 3:45 AM Mountain Daylight Time.3 The timing, deep into the night, aligns with the description of the venue as an “after-hours” establishment.1
The target location was consistently identified as an “illegal” or “underground” nightclub situated near the intersection of South Academy Boulevard and Airport Road in Colorado Springs.3 Some reports suggest the venue operated within a strip mall setting, housed in a nondescript building.5 While a precise street address was not immediately released by authorities, the intersection places the operation in a commercial area of the city.
The scale of the law enforcement presence was substantial, with reports indicating over 300 officers and agents participated.1 This force converged on the location where authorities estimated more than 200 patrons were present inside the club.1
The DEA’s Rocky Mountain Division was explicitly named as the lead agency coordinating the operation.2 Video released by the DEA depicted agents employing forceful tactics, including smashing a front window of the building after issuing warnings for occupants to exit.1 Footage showed people streaming out, some attempting to flee before being confronted by armed officers ordering them to the ground.3 The property owner later reported finding remnants of possible tear gas, suggesting chemical agents may have been used to control the scene.2 Such tactics often indicate law enforcement anticipated potential resistance or sought rapid control over a situation deemed high-risk, possibly influenced by intelligence regarding weapons or gang presence within the venue.2
A primary outcome highlighted by the DEA and subsequent reporting was the detention of individuals based on their immigration status. A specific figure of 114 people, identified by federal authorities as being unlawfully present in the United States, were taken into custody and transferred to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).3 This precise count, consistently reported across multiple news outlets citing the DEA, suggests a deliberate and organized effort to screen individuals for immigration status during the raid, pointing towards immigration enforcement being a significant component of the operation’s plan, not merely an incidental finding. This aligns with the substantial presence of ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) personnel.1
Beyond the immigration detentions, authorities reported that some patrons were arrested on pre-existing, undisclosed outstanding warrants.1 Attorney General Pam Bondi specified two such arrests occurred.4 Other individuals present were reportedly questioned and released or turned away without being detained.6
Inside the “Underground Nightclub”
The venue at the center of the raid was consistently described by law enforcement as an “illegal,” “underground,” and “after-hours” nightclub, operating outside the bounds of standard licensing and regulation.1 Its location within what appeared to be a nondescript commercial building or strip mall near Academy Boulevard and Airport Road contributed to its clandestine nature.5
Information regarding the property itself emerged from local news reports. KRDO spoke with Mike Moon, identified as the owner of the property, who stated he had leased the space to a woman purportedly running “private events”.2 Moon indicated the lease was set to expire at the end of April 2025. Following the raid, he reported finding his property damaged, with broken windows and locks, and possible tear gas residue. He also claimed to have discovered “little bags of drugs” while surveying the premises post-operation.2 Moon’s account suggests a degree of separation from the illicit activities, framing the venue’s use under the ambiguous term “private events.” However, the scale of the alleged criminal enterprise described by authorities—involving extensive drug trafficking, prostitution, and violence—raises questions about the nature of these events and the level of oversight or awareness concerning the activities occurring on the leased property.
The DEA stated the nightclub had been under investigation for “several months” prior to the raid.1 This prolonged surveillance, reportedly involving undercover work 6, was justified by allegations of “significant drug trafficking, prostitution, [and] crimes of violence” occurring within the establishment.1
A particularly prominent element in the official narrative was the alleged presence of organized criminal groups. Authorities asserted that the nightclub was frequented by members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua (TdA), the transnational gang MS-13, and the Hells Angels motorcycle club.2 Attorney General Bondi went further, referring to the TdA and MS-13 individuals allegedly present as “terrorists”.4 The emphasis on these specific, high-profile groups served to underscore the perceived severity of the threat, potentially justifying the massive federal response and aligning the operation with national security rhetoric prevalent under the Trump administration.4 However, DEA Special Agent in Charge (SAC) Jonathan Pullen clarified that while investigators had observed members of these groups during the months-long surveillance, he could not confirm if members were actually present and apprehended during the raid itself.5 This distinction is crucial, suggesting that while the venue may have served as a known gathering spot, the raid might have primarily netted patrons and lower-level operators rather than key figures from these organizations who happened to be there at that specific moment. The consistent highlighting of these gang affiliations could represent a strategic communication effort by authorities.
Anatomy of a Multi-Agency Operation
The official justification for the large-scale operation centered on combating serious criminal activity uncovered during the months-long DEA-led investigation.1 Statements emphasized the disruption of drug trafficking, prostitution, violence, and the seizure of weapons.1 DEA SAC Pullen framed the outcome positively, stating, “Colorado Springs is waking up to a safer community today”.1 This narrative was amplified at the national level by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who linked the operation directly to President Trump’s directive to “make America safe again,” positioning it as evidence of the administration’s policy success.1
The operation was notable for the sheer breadth of participating agencies, highlighting a coordinated federal and local effort.
Table 1: Participating Agencies and Likely Roles in Colorado Springs Nightclub Raid (April 27, 2025)
| Agency | Stated/Likely Role | Supporting Snippets |
| DEA (Rocky Mountain Division) | Lead agency, narcotics investigation, execution of raid | 2 |
| DHS / ICE / HSI | Immigration status verification, detention, processing for removal/deportation | 1 |
| FBI | Investigation of violent crime, potential gang activity (TdA, MS-13), organized crime | 3 |
| ATF | Firearms seizure, investigation of illegal possession/trafficking of weapons | 3 |
| IRS (Criminal Investigation) | Investigation of financial crimes, potential money laundering linked to drug/prostitution proceeds | 3 |
| U.S. Postal Police / Inspection Service (USPIS) | Investigation of potential use of mail system for drug trafficking or related financial transactions | 3 |
| U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) | Investigation of active-duty military personnel involvement, potential UCMJ violations | 4 |
| U.S. Marshals Service | Potential role in fugitive apprehension (warrant arrests), operational support | 9 |
| Colorado Springs Police Department (CSPD) | Local support, perimeter security, investigation of state/local criminal violations (explicitly not immigration) | 2 |
| El Paso County Sheriff’s Office (EPSO) | Local support, operational assistance | 4 |
The involvement of financial agencies like the IRS Criminal Investigation division and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service suggests the scope of the investigation potentially extended beyond immediate street-level crime.3 Their participation hints at efforts to trace money flows associated with the alleged drug trafficking and prostitution, or to investigate whether the mail system was utilized in furtherance of these activities, possibly indicating a more organized criminal enterprise.16
A significant aspect of the local involvement was clarified by Colorado Springs Police Chief Adrian Vasquez. In a statement, he emphasized that CSPD’s participation was solely focused on addressing criminal violations impacting community safety.2 He explicitly noted that CSPD is “not authorized to conduct immigration enforcement under Colorado law”.2 This declaration underscores a critical legal boundary between federal immigration enforcement and the responsibilities of local police under Colorado statutes, which aim to limit state and local entanglement in federal civil immigration matters.19 Chief Vasquez’s statement likely served both to comply with state law and potentially to reassure local immigrant communities about the role of their city police, highlighting the distinct federal nature of the immigration detentions carried out by ICE during the joint operation. This reflects a broader tension often seen between federal immigration priorities and state or local policies designed to foster community trust.21
Drugs and Weapons Seized
Authorities reported the seizure of both narcotics and firearms from the underground nightclub during the raid.2
Specific types of drugs mentioned in reports and official statements included cocaine 1, methamphetamine (meth) 4, and a substance referred to as “pink cocaine” or “tusi”.4 DEA SAC Pullen confirmed the recovery of “dozens of small packages of drugs”.6 The presence of “tusi,” often a brightly colored powder mixture containing substances like ketamine, MDMA, and potentially fentanyl, rather than actual cocaine, is noteworthy.4 Its identification could suggest connections to specific drug trends or trafficking networks, potentially correlating with the alleged presence of South American criminal elements like TdA, though this connection remains speculative without further evidence.
However, Pullen also noted a challenge for potential prosecutions: “When the cops showed up at the door, most of the drugs hit the floor”.1 This widespread discarding of substances could complicate efforts to link specific individuals to quantities sufficient for trafficking charges, potentially making it harder to prove possession with intent to distribute for many patrons. This difficulty in establishing individual criminal liability for drug trafficking might partially explain the significant focus on processing individuals based on immigration status and the initial description of criminal charges as “expected” rather than immediately filed against a large number of attendees.2
Regarding firearms, reports consistently mentioned that “a number of guns” or an “undisclosed number of guns” were seized.1 No specific details regarding the quantity, types, or legality of the firearms were provided in the available information. Official forfeiture notices, which sometimes detail seized assets, did not yet list items specifically from this operation.26
In addition to drugs and weapons, authorities also reported finding evidence related to prostitution activities within the venue.1
Table 2: Reported Seizures from Colorado Springs Nightclub Raid (April 27, 2025)
| Item Type | Specifics Mentioned | Quantity | Supporting Snippets |
| Drugs (Cocaine) | Cocaine | Unspecified; part of batch | 1 |
| Drugs (Pink Cocaine/Tusi) | Pink Cocaine / “Tusi” (likely synthetic mix) | Unspecified; part of batch | 4 |
| Drugs (Methamphetamine) | Methamphetamine | Unspecified; part of batch | 4 |
| Drugs (General) | “Dozens of small packages”; “little bags” | Dozens of packages | 2 |
| Firearms | Guns / Firearms | “A number”; “Undisclosed” | 1 |
| Other | Evidence of Prostitution | Nature unspecified | 1 |
Immigration Enforcement and the Legal Landscape
The detention of 114 individuals identified as unlawfully present in the U.S. was a central and widely reported outcome of the operation.3 These individuals were transferred to ICE custody and placed on buses for “processing and likely eventual deportation”.3 This action aligns with the broader immigration enforcement priorities of the second Trump administration, which emphasized increased removals, often through large-scale operations targeting individuals regardless of extensive criminal histories.1
The raid occurred within a complex legal environment in Colorado concerning immigration enforcement. As highlighted by CSPD Chief Vasquez, state law restricts the ability of local law enforcement agencies to engage in federal civil immigration enforcement.2 This legal framework likely contributed to the heavy reliance on federal agencies, particularly ICE and HSI, to handle the immigration aspects of the operation. Furthermore, the raid took place shortly after a federal judge in Colorado had issued a temporary restraining order blocking deportations under the administration’s controversial invocation of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act, indicating active legal challenges to federal immigration actions within the state.1
Previous reporting on similar large-scale, multi-agency raids involving the DEA and ICE in the Denver metro area had raised concerns among advocates and legal observers.22 In some instances, operations initiated under criminal warrants resulted primarily in immigration detentions, with relatively few subsequent state or federal criminal charges filed.22 This pattern fueled speculation about whether criminal investigations were sometimes used, intentionally or effectively, as a pretext to gain access for widespread immigration enforcement actions. Given the DEA lead but the large number of ICE detentions in this Colorado Springs case, similar questions arise about the operation’s primary objectives versus its outcomes. Was immigration enforcement a parallel goal from the outset, or an opportunistic consequence of the criminal raid? The available information suggests a strong immigration focus, integrated into the operation’s execution.
The potential consequences for those detained by ICE are severe. The phrase “likely eventual deportation” points towards the initiation of removal proceedings.3 One report specifically mentioned the possibility of individuals allegedly associated with TdA or MS-13 being deported to El Salvador’s controversial CECOT mega-prison, a facility designated by the Trump administration for housing members of groups it declared terrorist organizations.9 This potential destination underscores the harsh realities facing those placed into removal proceedings following such raids.
Concerns have also been raised in Colorado about the impact of federal immigration enforcement on the local criminal justice system. District attorneys have previously expressed frustration that deporting individuals who are defendants or witnesses in local criminal cases can impede prosecutions and deny justice to victims.21 It remains unclear if any individuals detained in this raid were involved in pending local cases.
Military Involvement
A striking feature of the raid was the discovery of over a dozen active-duty U.S. military service members inside the illegal nightclub.1 Reports indicated these individuals were present either as patrons or, more concerningly, were allegedly working as armed security for the illicit operation.1 DEA SAC Pullen stated that these service members were reportedly “involved in some of these crimes” occurring inside the venue.5
Given the serious nature of these allegations—military personnel potentially providing armed protection for an establishment linked to drug trafficking, prostitution, and gang activity—the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division (CID) became involved.4 Army CID agents were reportedly on scene during the operation, partnering with the DEA.4 The detained service members were handed over to Army CID for investigation.5
Initial reports clarified the status of the military personnel as “detained” but “not under arrest” by civilian authorities.4 This distinction likely reflects the jurisdictional transition to military authorities. While civilian agencies may detain service members during an incident, formal charges related to violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) typically fall under the purview of military investigators like Army CID. Their alleged conduct could lead to significant disciplinary action, including court-martial, separate from any potential civilian charges.
DEA SAC Pullen acknowledged the situation was “obviously concerning” while also noting it was “not necessarily surprising” due to the significant military presence in Colorado Springs, home to several major installations including Fort Carson.8 The incident raises questions about off-duty conduct, potential exploitation of service members by criminal enterprises operating near military bases, and the oversight of secondary employment for military personnel.
Community Reaction and Aftermath
Official statements following the raid consistently focused on themes of public safety and successful enforcement. DEA SAC Pullen asserted the operation made Colorado Springs safer 1, while AG Bondi celebrated it as a victory for the Trump administration’s security agenda.1 CSPD, meanwhile, carefully delineated its role, emphasizing its focus on state and local crime while adhering to Colorado law limiting involvement in immigration enforcement.2
While specific statements from immigrant rights organizations or legal aid groups concerning this particular April 27th raid were not found in the immediate reporting, the context of previous federal immigration operations in Colorado provides insight into likely community concerns.20 Advocacy groups like the Colorado Immigrant Rights Coalition (CIRC) and the ACLU of Colorado have historically voiced strong opposition to large-scale raids, citing fears of racial profiling, the tearing apart of families, erosion of community trust in law enforcement, and lack of due process.19 They often challenge the official narrative that such operations primarily target dangerous criminals, pointing to instances where individuals with minor or no criminal records, including asylum seekers, are swept up in enforcement actions.27 Legal organizations have also actively challenged federal immigration tactics in Colorado through lawsuits and petitions for greater transparency regarding raid warrants and execution.1
The raid, therefore, likely generated a polarized response: viewed by some through the official lens of crime reduction and border security, and by others (particularly within immigrant communities and advocacy circles) with fear and skepticism regarding its true motives and impact on civil liberties. The operation serves as a stark example of the clash between assertive federal immigration enforcement strategies and state-level efforts to create sanctuary or limit local cooperation, playing out within a community heavily populated by both immigrants and military personnel.
Operation Outcomes and Unanswered Questions
As of the initial reporting, many questions regarding the raid’s ultimate outcomes remained unanswered.
The 114 individuals turned over to ICE were undergoing processing, facing an uncertain future involving potential detention and deportation.3 Their specific locations within the ICE detention system, the progress of their immigration cases, and whether they have accessed legal representation were not detailed in the available reports. Verification of their legal status and any potential gang affiliations remained pending.12
Regarding criminal charges stemming directly from the raid’s findings (drugs, weapons, prostitution), authorities stated that arrests for these violations were “expected”.2 However, apart from the two individuals arrested on pre-existing warrants 4, there was no immediate confirmation of new criminal charges being filed against patrons or operators specifically for activities uncovered during the operation. The significant gap between the estimated 200+ people present, the 114 detained by ICE, and the 2 warrant arrests leaves the immediate outcome for roughly 80 individuals unclear. The materialization (or lack thereof) of substantial criminal charges will be a key factor in evaluating whether the operation primarily achieved its stated criminal investigation goals or functioned more significantly as an immigration enforcement action.
The investigation into the dozen or more active-duty military personnel by Army CID was ongoing.5 The findings of that investigation and any subsequent actions under the UCMJ were yet to be determined.
The future of the venue itself was also uncertain. The property owner reported significant damage 2, and the lease was reportedly near its end.
Furthermore, DEA SAC Pullen indicated that this raid might not be an isolated event, mentioning other “pending operations” in the Colorado Springs area could lead to further arrests.6 This suggests a potentially broader, ongoing federal law enforcement initiative in the region.
Key unanswered questions include:
- What specific evidence substantiated the claims of TdA, MS-13, and Hells Angels actively using the club? Were any verified members of these groups arrested?
- What were the precise quantities and types of drugs and firearms seized?
- How many individuals ultimately faced new criminal charges resulting from the raid, and what were those charges?
- What is the current status, location, and legal disposition of the 114 individuals taken into ICE custody?
- What are the specific findings and disciplinary outcomes of the Army CID investigation?
- What was the true nature of the “private events” being conducted at the venue?
- What has been the response from local immigrant advocacy and legal aid organizations?
Conclusion: A Tangled Web of Enforcement
The multi-agency raid on the Colorado Springs underground nightclub on April 27, 2025, stands as a complex event situated at the crossroads of criminal investigation, heightened federal immigration enforcement, and military discipline. The operation successfully shut down an illicit venue alleged to be a site of significant criminal activity, resulting in the seizure of narcotics and firearms. Simultaneously, it led to the mass detention of 114 individuals based on their immigration status, marking a significant immigration enforcement action under the DEA’s operational lead.
The involvement of over ten federal agencies, alongside local law enforcement and military investigators, underscores the multifaceted nature of the perceived threat and the resources mobilized in response. However, it also highlights the potential for competing priorities and jurisdictional complexities, particularly evident in the contrast between federal immigration actions and Colorado state law limiting local police involvement. The presence and alleged criminal involvement of active-duty military personnel adds another layer of gravity and requires separate investigation under military justice.
While officials touted the raid as a success for public safety, critical questions remain unanswered. The strength of the evidence linking the venue to specific gang operations, the ultimate number and severity of criminal charges filed compared to the number of immigration detentions, and the final disposition of those taken into custody by both ICE and Army CID will be crucial in fully assessing the operation’s impact and primary drivers. The event serves as a potent case study of contemporary federal law enforcement strategies, the persistent tensions surrounding immigration policy, and the far-reaching consequences for the individuals caught within a tangled web of overlapping enforcement mandates. Further information and follow-up from the involved agencies are necessary to provide a complete accounting of this significant operation.
Works cited
- More than 100 immigrants detained at an illegal after-hours …, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.newsday.com/news/nation/colorado-nightclub-raid-immigration-r08171
- More than 100 illegal immigrants in custody after underground …, accessed April 27, 2025, https://krdo.com/news/2025/04/27/dea-conduction-operation-with-local-law-enforcement-in-colorado-springs/
- DEA says over 100 undocumented immigrants arrested at Colorado Springs “underground nightclub” – CBS News, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/dea-over-100-undocumented-immigrants-arrested-colorado-springs-nightclub/
- Over 100 illegal immigrants arrested in Colorado Springs massive underground nightclub raid – Fox News, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/us/more-than-100-illegal-immigrants-arrested-colorado-springs-massive-underground-nightclub-raid
- More than100 immigrants arrested in raid on underground Colorado nightclub, feds say – Toledo Blade, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.toledoblade.com/news/nation/2025/04/27/immigrants-arrested-raid-underground-colorado-nightclub/stories/20250427137
- DEA raids illegal, underground nightclub raid in Colorado Springs | 9news.com, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.9news.com/article/news/crime/dea-raid-nightclub-colorado-springs/73-537154df-75aa-4215-9459-b15b7921b677
- More than 100 immigrants detained at an illegal after-hours nightclub in Colorado – Alton Telegraph, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.thetelegraph.com/news/article/more-than-100-immigrants-detained-at-an-illegal-20297050.php
- 300 federal agents arrest 100 undocumented immigrants in ‘underground nightclub’ raid, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/colorado-springs-nightclub-raid-ice-b2740406.html
- Over 100 Migrants, Service Members Arrested in Major Illegal Nightclub Raid – Newsweek, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/over-100-migrants-service-members-arrested-major-illegal-nightclub-raid-2064772
- Over 100 immigrants arrested in raid on underground Colorado nightclub where active-duty military members worked, feds say | KRDO, accessed April 27, 2025, https://krdo.com/news/2025/04/27/over-100-immigrants-arrested-in-raid-on-underground-colorado-nightclub-where-active-duty-military-members-worked-feds-say/
- The Moment DEA Agents Conduct Raid in Colorado Springs – YouTube, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTI-gN9GXxo
- The DEA says 114 immigrants in the U.S. illegally were arrested at a Colorado nightclub, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.aspenpublicradio.org/2025-04-27/the-dea-says-114-immigrants-in-the-u-s-illegally-were-arrested-at-a-colorado-nightclub
- More than 100 people detained, dozens of drugs seized in Colorado club raid, accessed April 27, 2025, https://san.com/cc/more-than-100-people-detained-dozens-of-drugs-seized-in-colorado-club-raid/
- News – FBI, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/transnational-organized-crime/news
- District of Colorado | News | United States Department of Justice, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/usao-co/pr
- If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. – Office of Justice Programs, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Photocopy/134221NCJRS.pdf
- Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces | Press Room – Department of Justice, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/ocdetf/press-room
- Fentanyl Trafficker and DC Rapper Sentenced for Bringing Thousands of Counterfeit Oxycodone Pills into the District | United States Department of Justice, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/fentanyl-trafficker-and-dc-rapper-sentenced-bringing-thousands-counterfeit-oxycodone
- Aurora, Denver legislators lead measure limiting cooperation with ICE – Sentinel Colorado, accessed April 27, 2025, https://sentinelcolorado.com/metro/aurora-denver-legislators-lead-measure-limiting-cooperation-with-ice/
- NBC News: Trump administration delaying Aurora immigration operation after media leaks, accessed April 27, 2025, https://sentinelcolorado.com/metro/nbc-news-trump-administration-delaying-aurora-immigration-operation-after-media-leaks/
- ICE detention, deportation can deny justice in local criminal cases, frustrating prosecutors – Colorado Public Radio, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.cpr.org/2025/04/10/ice-detention-deportation-impacts-victims-rights-judicial-system/
- Immigration raids in Colorado, both highly visible and cloaked in secrecy, rattle advocates and local authorities, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.cpr.org/2025/02/06/colorado-immigration-raids-rattle-advocates-authorities/
- Colorado braces for immigration raids as ICE sets up processing center at Buckley Space Force Base in Aurora, accessed April 27, 2025, https://coloradosun.com/2025/01/29/immigration-raids-colorado-aurora/
- Over 100 illegal immigrants and more than a dozen active-duty military members detained during raid – YouTube, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhS1hysgerE
- Over 100 illegal immigrants arrested in Colorado Springs massive underground nightclub raid – WFIN Local News, accessed April 27, 2025, https://wfin.com/fox-national-news/over-100-illegal-immigrants-arrested-in-colorado-springs-massive-underground-nightclub-raid/
- DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION APRIL 27, 2025 POSTED ON – Forfeiture.gov, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.forfeiture.gov/pdf/DEA/OfficialNotification.pdf
- As ICE expands its Colorado efforts, many without criminal records are caught in a wide net, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.cpr.org/2025/04/07/undocumented-immigrants-without-criminal-records-detained-by-ice/
- ACLU Colorado, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.aclu-co.org/
- Colorado Public Radio petitions federal court to unseal ICE/DEA raid documents, accessed April 27, 2025, https://coloradofoic.org/colorado-public-radio-petitions-federal-court-to-unseal-ice-dea-raid-documents/
- DEA Special Agent Jonathan Pullen provides upates on the multi-agency raid in Colorado Springs – YouTube, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XahJTTvXiB8
- Active duty military members among those detained in Colorado Springs bust, DEA says, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEdr__IH6zw
- April 9, 2025: ICE’s ‘collateral arrests’ include a former slave; Choir director finds harmony off stage | Colorado Public Radio, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.cpr.org/show-episode/april-9-2025-ices-collateral-arrests-include-a-former-slave-choir-director-finds-harmony-off-stage/
Responses